144 IX. DISPOSITION 327. For the foregoing reasons, THE APPEALS CHAMBER, UNANIMOUSLY (1) DENIES the first ground of the Appellant’s Appeal against Judgement; (2) DENIES the third ground of the Appellant’s Appeal against Judgement; (3) RESERVES JUDGEMENT on the Appellant’s Appeal against Sentence until such time as the further sentencing proceedings referred to in sub-paragraph (6) below have been completed; (4) ALLOWS the first ground of the Prosecution’s Cross-Appeal, REVERSES the Trial Chamber’s verdict in this part, AND FINDS the Appellant guilty on Counts 8, 9, 12, 15, 21 and 32 of the Indictment; (5) ALLOWS the second ground of the Prosecution’s Cross-Appeal, REVERSES the Trial Chamber’s verdict in this part, AND FINDS the Appellant guilty on Counts 29, 30 and 31 of the Indictment; (6) DEFERS sentencing on the Counts mentioned in sub-paragraphs (4) and (5) above to a further stage of sentencing proceedings; (7) HOLDS that an act carried out for the purely personal motives of the perpetrator can constitute a crime against humanity within the meaning of Article 5 of the Tribunal’s Statute relating to such crimes; (8) FINDS that the Trial Chamber erred in finding that all crimes against humanity require discriminatory intent and HOLDS that such intent is an indispensable legal ingredient of the offence only with regard to those crimes for which it is expressly required, that is, for the types of persecution crimes mentioned in Article 5(h) of the Tribunal’s Statute; Case No.: -94-1-A 15 July 1999