65. Similarly, in the case of AMINATA DIAI{TOU DIANE v. REPUBLIC OF MALI ECW/CCJ/J[]D/ 14/ I B @ pS. l4 urceported, the Court held that: "Where a Statefails to conduct inquiry into specific violations, with the expected outcome of ensuring that the perpetrators are brought to book, it constitutes a proof of lack of commitment on the part of such State, for taking appropriate measures to address the violations at stake; that the absence of inquiry in such an instance makes the State b 66. lamab le for default on its international r espons ib il ity " . The Court equally aligns itself with the position of the European Court in SHAVADZE v. GEORGIA (supra), where it held that: ffictive investigation into unlmaful or suspicious deaths is well established in the Court's case-lqw. Even "The obligation to carry out an where there may be obstacles or dfficulties which prevent progress in an investigation in a particular situation, a prompt response by the authorities is vitalfor maintainingpublic confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts. In order to comply with the requirements of Article 2 of the Convention, the investigation must be effective in the sense that it is capable of leading to the establishment of the relevant facts and to the identification and, if appropriate, punishment of those responsible. This is an obligation which concerns the means to be employed and not the results to be achieved. The authorities must take reasonable steps available to them to secnre the evidence concerning an incident, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, vvhere appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accnrate record of injury and an objective analysis of including, %{k-