00050 s B. Conditions of admissibility not in contention between the Parties 50. The conditions in respect of the identity of the Applicant, incompatibility with the constitutive Act of the African Union and the charter, the language used in the Application, the nature of the evidence adduced and the principle that an application must not raise any matter already determined in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter, the Constitutive Act of the African Union, the provisions of the Charter or of any other legal instruments of the African Union (Sub-Rules 1 , 2, 3, 4 and 7 of Rule 40 of the Rules), are not in contention between the Parties. The Court notes that nothing on record indicates that any of these conditions have not been fulfilled in this case. 51. ln light of the foregoing, the court finds that this Application meets all the admissibility conditions set out in Article 56 of the Charter and Rule 40 of the Rules and declares the Application admissible. VlI. 52. MERITS The Applicant alleges that his rights guaranteed in the Charter under Article 2 on the right not to be discriminated against and Article 3 on the right to equality before the law and to equal protection of the law were violated. 53. ln so far as the allegations of violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Charter are linked to the allegation of violation of Article 7 of the Charter, the Court will first consider the latter allegation.ll A. Allegations of violations relating to Article 54. 7 of the Gharter The Applicant alleges violation of his rights relating to an alleged manifest error in the judgment of the court of Appeal based on his improper identification. He also alleges that the Court of Appeal upheld his conviction and sentence based lL Peter Joseph chacha v tJnited Repubtic of ranzania (2014) (admissibitity), 1 AfcLR 398, j22 S