17. As regards the other two questions posed by the Republic of Cote d'ivoire, the Court notes that they do not relate to any of the operative provisions of the Judgment of which interpretation is requested. 18. In view of the foregoing, the Court holds in conclusion that none of the three questions posed by the Republic of Cote d'ivoire is intended to clarify the meaning or scope of any point in the operative provisions of the afore-mentioned Judgment delivered by the Court on 18 November 2016. 19. The Court accordingly finds that, although the instant Application for interpretation was filed within the 12-month time limit prescribed in the Rules, it does not meet the other admissibility conditions set forth in Rules 66 (1) and (2) of the Rules and must therefore be declared inadmissible. v. COSTS 20. In terms of Rule 30 of the Rules, "unless otherwise decided by the Court, each party shall bear its own costs". 21. Taking into account the circumstances of this matter the Court decides that each party should bear its own costs 22. For these reasons, The Court, Unanimously: i) Declares that it has jurisdiction to hear the present Application. ii) Declares that the Application is inadmissible. iii) Rules that each Party shall bear its own Costs. 5