000511" of Bunda contravenes his rights that are provided in the Respondent State's Constitution. He claims: "That the administrative omission of the respondent has all along been, and it is more likely so to prevail if not judicially attacked, contravening the rights and equality before the law as provided for by Article 13(1)of the constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania amongst many others of the constitution". Specific provisions of the Constitution of Tanzania 1977, which are violated, so the basis of this application:- That, the basis of this application (violations) is basically pagged (sic) on Article 1 3(1 ),3, 4, 6(a) and 26(1), 2 of the constitution of the united Republic of Tanzania, 1977;' 8 ln the Reply to the Respondent State's Response, the Applicant claims that the Respondent State's failure to provide him with certified true copies of the record of proceedings and judgments is proof of discrimination against him and a violation of his right to equal protection of the law and equal protection of the law as well as to his fair trial rights provided by Articles 2,3(1) and (2) and article 7 of the African Charter. III. I SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COURT The Application to which was appended a request for Provisional Measures, was filed on 29 January 2016 and served on the Respondent State on 23 February 2016. 10. The Application together with the request for Provisional Measures was transmitted to the State Parties to the Protocol, the Chairperson of the African Union Commission, the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights and 4 6 k