AC PR
African Commission on
Human and Peoples' Rights
Human Rights our
Collective Responsibility
"the Republic of South Africa" as
ondents, the Commission recognizing
that its jurisdiction is limited to State
to the African Charter, became
seized of the present Communication I
in relation to the Republic of South
Africa. This position is reflected in: the
name of the Communication,
the Commission's communications to I Parties, as well as the parties' various
submissions on Admissibility.
71. Article 56(5) of the African Charter
that "Communications". received by
the Commission shall be considered
they '" are sent after exhausting local
remedies, if any, unless it is obvious
this
is unduly prolonged."
t state must
This requirement is premised on the
the framework of
first have an opportunity to redress by
its own domestic legal system, the
individual." 10
72. On the other hand, the
have been exhausted, in view
protection of their rights with alternative and
.
they should not be
not been granted.
State has declared-tlfat
appeal againstf!~Jj~~~;r
\~'<J
73. The Complaipents also
as there is no court superior to the
~6:tilhpl'Y1 in a position that they have no
Constitutional.Court, its decision
remedy and f~ce.\\possibleeviction,
attached to the complaint, relevant
decisions of the', 'nq~ional court~>;
the High Court, through to the
Co~~ii.Y#QpalC011rt~u~eSl;;'f,\ ,':~sB, I and D annexed to the Complaint).
\;;~\ "~:'~::~;::', .• '>'"
'/;", ;:0:
74. In the 'E!esent:<;~s.e",the
Respondent
argued that the Complainant has not
exhaust~8\~9fuestitir;'~~E:!dieS
as the
Application is still pending in the
national eqprts. Whi!,~tthe Resp
State contended that local remedies are
available t6',·tJ::te
Complainants, it has
shown how the local remedy indicated
to be avail~Qle;. would sufficiently redress the rights alleged by the
Complainantsitto have been violate
'sufficient' if it is capable of redressing I
point, the Commission finds that the
onus to show that the local remedy it is
75. In this regard, the Commission notes
national courts which is referenced
10
Purohit & Anor v The Gambia (2003) AHRLR 96
2003) para 25.