iv. that whilst in Kampala, the Applicant was detained on the 16th September, 2010, interrogated and recorded a statement with the Uganda Police; v. that on 17th September, 2010 the Applicant was transferred to Entebbe International Airport Police Station; vi. that the Applicant voluntarily returned to Kenya in the morning of 18 th September, 2010 and his passport was only stamped with an exit stamp; vii. that the 1st Respondent denies that the Applicant was deported and further denies that its servants, agents marked or in any way mutilated the Applicant’s passport; viii. that the 1st Respondent denies in toto the allegations of violation of the stipulated Treaties and instruments and contends that its servants, agents executed their duties professionally, in accordance with Uganda’s Laws and in compliance with the stipulated Treaties and instruments; ix. that the 1st Respondent contends that the Applicant is not entitled to the remedies sought. CASE FOR THE 2ND RESPONDENT The 2nd Respondent’s case is contained in his response to the Reference filed on 27th February, 2012. In a nutshell, the 2nd Respondent denies vehemently the allegations of the Applicant. In summary, the 2nd Respondent’s case is expressed as follows: i. that he was not aware of the arrest, interrogation, detention and the alleged deportation of the Applicant; ii. that he denies any implication and responsibility for the sub judice matter; REFERENCE NO.11 OF 2011 Page 8