00 023 r the date on which the supreme court delivered the Judgment being challenged by the APPlicant.l IV Territorial jurisdiction: the facts occurred on the territory of the Respondent State which does not contest the same. 1g. ln view of the aforesaid, the Court holds that it has jurisdiction to examine this Application. VI. ADMISSIBILITY OF THE APPLICATION 20. ln terms of Article 6 (2) of the Protocol, "the Court shall rule on the admissibility of cases taking into account the provisions of Article 56 of the Charter". Pursuant to Rule 3g of its Rules, "the Court shall conduct preliminary examination...of the admissibility of the Application in accordance with Articles 50 and 56 of the Charter and Rule 40 of these Rules". 21 . Rule 40 of the Rules which in essence reproduces the contents of Article 56 of the Charter stiPulates that: "ln terms of Rule 40 of the Rules of Court, which in substance reproduces the content of Article 56 of the Charter, Applications shall be admissible if they fulfil the following conditions: 1. 2. lndicate their authors even if the latter request anonymity, Are compatible with the charter of the organization of African Unity or with the present Charter, 3. 4. Are not written in disparaging or insulting language, Are not based exclusively on news discriminated through the mass media, 5. Are sent after exhausting local remedies, if any, unless it is obvious that this procedure is unduly prolonged, Application 01312011, Judgment of 21 June 2013 on preliminary objection, Norbert Zongo et al v. Burkina Faso, para.62; Application OO112O14, Judgment of 18 November 2016 on the Merits, APDH v COte d'lvoire, Para. 66 1 7 c; \