assemble freely, protected respectively by Articles 9, 10 and 11 of the Charter. 87. The Respondent State did not submit on this allegation. *** 88. The Court notes that Law No. 2018-01 of 4 January 2018 on the status of the judiciary was repealed by Law No.2018-33 of 5 October 2018, thereby preserving judges’ right to strike. 89. It follows, that the allegations of violation of the judges’ right to strike and the violation of related rights made by the Applicant are moot. C. On the alleged violation of Article 30 of the Protocol for non-execution of the decisions of the Court. 90. The Applicant submits that the Court has rendered several decisions against the Respondent State, namely, the Ruling of 9 December 2018 and the judgments of 29 March and 29 November 2019 in Application No. 013/2017 Sébastien Ajavon v. Benin; the judgment of 27 November 2020 in Application No. 059/2019 XYZ v. Benin; the Ruling of 17 April 2020 and the judgment of 4 December 2020 in Application No. 062/2019 Sébastien Germain Ajavon v. Benin; the Rulings of 5 May and 25 September 2020, the judgment of 4 December 2020 in Application No. 003/2020 Houngue Eric Noudéhouenou v. Benin; the judgment of 27 November 2020 in Application No. 010/2020 XYZ v. Benin. 91. He asserts that by these decisions, the Court had ordered the Respondent State to take the necessary measures, among others, to repeal the Electoral Code and subsequent laws before any election; to suspend the effects of 27