17.At its 42nd Ordinary 59 (1) M. Sssirn heH fom 5b 16 Sepbmber, 2016, he Cou( pursnnttrc Rub ofhe Rulesdqiledbdcetewittsn poeedlngs ardbprwed wih defbemtirs. PRAYERS OF THE PARTIES 18,ln the Application, the Court is requested to: '(i) uphold all the rights flouted and vlolated by the Respondent State; (ii) rehabilitate the Applicant with respect to all his rights; (iii) order reparations for all the darnages he suffered' 19.1n his Reply to the Respondent'S Response, the Applicant prays the Court to '(i) find that the Respondenl has violated his right to full equality before the law and his right to equal protection of the law as enshrined in Article 3 of the Charter; (ii) (iii) find that the Respondent has violated his right to a fair trial as enshrined in Article 7 of the Charter; set aside the guilty verdict and the punishment imposed on him and, consequently order his release from prison; (iv) issue an order for reparation; (v) order such other measures or remedies as this Honourable Couft may deem appropriate". 20.|n its Response to the Application, the Respondent prays the Court, with respect to its jurisdiction and the admissibility of the Application, to: !(i) Rule that the Applioation has not evoked (sic) the jurisdiclion of the Cou( and shsuld consequ€ntly be dismissed; (ii) Rule that the Application has not met the admissibility requirements stipulated under Rule consequently dismiss 40 (5) and (6) of the Rules of Court and it & 6 JL /