D) Ifte allegation that the Respondent violated Adicle 'l of the Charter 86. ln the Application, it is alleged in general terms that the Respondent violated Article 1 of the Charter. The Respondent did not fiake any submission on this allegation. 87. Article 1 of the Gharter provides that: "The Member States of the Organisation of African Unity, parties to the present Charter shall recognize the rights, duties and freedoms enshrined in the Charter and shall undertake to adopt legislative or other measures to give effect to them". BB. The Court has found that the Respondent violated Article 7(1) (c) of the Charter for failing to avail the Applicant with free legal assistance. lt therefore reiterates its decision in Alex Thomas v. the United Republic of Tanzanla. ln that Matter, the Courtnoted that "...when the Courtfinds that any of the rights, duties and freedoms set out in the Charter are curtailed, violated or not being achieved, this necessarily means that the obligation set out under Article 1 of the Charter has not been complied with and has been violated."ll 89.Having established that the Appticant was denied his right to free legal assistance, in violation of Article 7(1) (c) of the Charter, the Court finds that the Respondent consequently violated its obligation under Article 1 of the Charter" VII. ON REPARATIONS 90.|n the Application, the Court is requested to; (i) restore the Applicant's rights, (ii) annul the guilty verdict and the punishment imposed on him, (iii) order his release from detention, and (iv) order that reparations be made for all the human rights violations established. 11Alex Thomas v. United Republic November, 2015, paragraph 135. of Tanzania (Application No. 005/20 { liiu .) l,/ \--l 1 I \J U/\ ,1, ) 't$(/'- 21' ,. /\ v\ {-, 1i' /\ --/ i\ I glt KE