the legality of his subsequent arrest. The claims in the said suit are same as in this suit and in delivering its ruling, the court held that his bail was adequately enjoyed by him and if he has any grievance on his subsequent arrest he should sue the State Security Services of the Defendant claiming his right. 2.10. That the Applicant now seeks to re-litigate that case before this Honourable Court. 2.11 That it is justifiable under the Defendant’s law to detain the Applicant as the allegation borders on offence which affects the National security of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. 2.12 That the Applicant was a high ranking military officer in the Defendant with a wide range of vulnerable escape route out of the country and thereby poses a serious threat to the security of the Defendant as a nation. 2.13 That the Applicant, if released may make it impossible in Nigeria for Courts to sit and determine the criminal charges against him. 2.14 The Applicant has varieties of means to substantially intervene with the investigation and put the national security of the Defendant and other neighbouring West African nations in jeopardy. 2.15 That the Defendant had not in any way prevented or denied the Applicant his right to bail as granted by the courts. The Applicant Subsequently filed with the leave of Court additional reliefs as follows; 1. A DELCARATION that the re-arrest and the subsequent detention on or about 5" November, 2015 of the Applicant by the officers, servants, 14