12. Given the tension generated by the case nationally, the Court of Appealof Tanzania, in accordance with section 4(3) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, Cap 141 R.E. 2002, took up the matter and rendered a decision in which it declared that the High Court had been properly seized to issue the Certificate requested, and ordered that the matter be re-examined and disposed of by another Judge of the High Court. 13. According to the Applicants, the case was assigned to Justice Fauz Twaib, Twaib. They their approach. claim colleagues that when listed they under appeared List 3A before adopted a Justice different According to them, their colleagues submitted an amount which was higher and requested the Judge to substitute it for the one which had been taken into account by the Court of Appeal. 14. In his judgement dated 23 May 2011, Justice Fauz Twaib dismissed the application entirely, on the grounds that there was no outstanding amount to be paid. 15: The Applicants aver further that following this decision, they left the Courtroom They later sent in anger but stayed their in front of the Court premises. representatives to see the Chief Justice of Tanzania to direct them as to the way forward. 16. According to the Applicants, while waiting for the answers, the Respondent sent an elite force of the Tanzania Police to disperse them. Pandemonium ensued since the complainants wanted to leave &y4 ty : AG. Cc eS