c. Not contain any disparaging or insulting language; d. Not based exclusively on news disseminated through the mass media; e. Are sent after exhausting local remedies, if any, unless it is obvious that this procedure is unduly prolonged, f. Be filed within a reasonable time from the date local remedies were exhausted or from the date set by the Court as being the commencement of the time limit within which it shall be seized with the matter; g. Do not deal with cases which have been settled by those States involved in accordance with the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, or the Constitutive Act of African Union or the provisions of the Charter 29. The Court notes that the Respondent State raises three objections to the admissibility of the Application, based on incompatibility of the Application with the Constitutive Act of the African Union (the Constitutive Act), nonexhaustion of local remedies and failure to file the Application within a reasonable time. The Court will first consider these objections before examining other admissibility requirements, if necessary. A. Objection to the admissibility of the Application based on incompatibility with the Constitutive Act of the African Union 30. The Respondent State contends that in order to be admissible, an application must indicate the provisions of international legal instruments violated by the Respondent State. It cites a decision in which the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights declared a communication inadmissible on the grounds that the allegations of human rights violations were vague.7 31. It submits that the alleged violation of the right to a fair trial related to a private law dispute between the Applicant and his employer, which was the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Communication Frédérick Korvan v. Liberia, Application No. /88, 26 October 1988, § 4. 7 11