3. THAT, the two grounds had already raised and decided by the first appellate court (High Court) with1n the pet1tion of appeal. Thus the court of appeal had needed to determine the ground to dec1de them. Furthermore, it was required to store the interest o f justice for the applicant t h a n t o be bound b y the procedure 4. THAT, it’s obvious the applicant was isolated on procedure a n d decision of the court of appeal. The acts were violating the fundamental rights of the charter of the court A r t i c l e 3(2) wh1ch required every individual to be entitled to equal protection of the law 5. THAT, the applicant humbly begs that, this court to re-store jus tice where it was overlooked and quash both conviction and sentence 1mposed upon h1m and set him at liberty. THAT, the applicant herein above on his own behalf wish to be granted 6. reparation pursuant to Article 27(1) of the protocol of the court. 7. THAT, this court may grant any other order (s) or relief (s) sought that may deem fit in the circumstance of the complaint. 8. THAT, the application is intended to be supported by a submission of complaints of violation of Human Rights and justice accompanied by a copy of record of the court 1n the criminal appeal, together with a copy of the court of appeal judgment. This Executive summary had been prepared by me. the applicant at But1mba central prison at Mwanza a n d s igne d by I my-self t h i s ·····-3rd······· day of November 2015.... (RTP)......................................... APPLICANT 2