114. The Court considers that, in the instant case, there is no reason to depart from the principle laid down in the aforementioned provision. Consequently, it orders that each party shall bear its own costs. X. OPERATIVE PART 115. For these reasons, THE COURT Unanimously, On jurisdiction i. Declares that it has jurisdiction; On admissibility ii. Declares the Application admissible; On merits iii. Finds that the Respondent State did not violate the Applicants’ right to be to non-discrimination under Article 2 of the Charter; iv. Finds that the Respondent State did not violate the Applicants to equality before the law and equal protection of the law, protected under Article 3 of the Charter; v. Finds that the Respondent State did not violate the Applicants’ right to seize domestic courts in respect of any violation of their fundamental rights, protected under Article 7(1)(d) of the Charter; vi. Finds that the Respondent State did not violate the right of the Applicants to be tried within a reasonable time, protected under Article 7(1)(d) of the Charter; 26