5. AN ORDER DIRECTING the 2nd – 15th Defendants to permit the Plaintiff to enforce the decision and orders of this Honourable Court made in his favour against any of the 1st Defendant’s assets that may be found within any of their territories without any regard to the 1st Defendant’s putative sovereign immunity. 6. AN ORDER MANDATING the 16th and 17th Defendants and the Authority of Heads of State and Government of ECOWAS to impose the sanctions prescribed in Article 77 of the ECOWAS Revised Treaty on the 1st Defendant if it continues in its refusal, failure and/or neglect to comply with the decision and orders of this Honourable Court made against it. 7. COSTS of this application. The 16th and 17th Defendants filed a preliminary objection praying this Court to dismiss/strike out this suit for want of jurisdiction or in the alternative, to strike out their names from the suit; they not being proper parties. Specifically, the 16th and 17th Defendants/Applicants’ motion is grounded as follows: 1. That the Honourable Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the Plaintiff/Respondent’s application for enforcement of its judgment 2. That the 16th and 17th Defendants/Applicants not being proper, desirable or necessary parties in this action should have their names struck out from the suit against the 1st Defendant. The Application for preliminary objection was heard in open Court by the previously constituted panel of the Court but was unable to deliver 6