6) Héctor Magallón Larson, Coordinator of Greenpeace Forest and Jungle Campaign, Mexico, an expert in environmental issues and deforestation, a witness proposed by the representatives, who testified on the following aspects: i) the “knowledge that Greenpeace-Mexico had regarding the [alleged] deforestation of the forests in Guerrero state and, particularly, in the region of Sierra de Petatlán and Coyuca de Catalán;” ii) the reasons that led to Greenpeace’s involvement in the campaign to release Messrs. Cabrera García and Montiel Flores; iii) “[an] overview of the [alleged] difficulties encountered by community environmentalists in Mexico, emphasizing the [alleged] lack of protection faced by peasants and indigenous people struggling to preserve the ecosystems in their communities;” 7) Miguel Carbonell Sánchez, a researcher at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico [National Autonomous University of Mexico], an expert witness proposed by the Inter-American Commission, who testified on the following aspects: i) “the involvement of the military jurisdiction in the investigation and prosecution of crimes that are not the responsibility of and/or which could constitute human rights violations;” ii) “the theories of the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice in relation to [the] scope of the application of military justice in Mexico,” and iii) “the constitutional and legal regulation of the scope of the application of military justice in Mexico;” 8) Ernesto López Portillo Vargas, an expert on public security, Executive Director of the Instituto para la Seguridad y la Democracia A.C. (Institute for Security and Democracy) (Insyde) and Adviser to the Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Distrito Federal (Human Rights Commission of the Federal District), an expert witness proposed by the representatives, who testified on the following aspects: i) “the security policies implemented by the State […] in which the armed forces have [allegedly] been involved in public security tasks and the [alleged] lack of adequate domestic or civil controls over the actions of those forces;” ii) “the profile that a unit of lawenforcement officials should have,” and iii) minimum standards of oversight required to ensure adequate accountability in such units, the consequences of their actions and respect for the human rights of the civilian population in the absence of adequate oversight; 9) Jose Luis Piñeyro, a sociologist and researcher, Professor at the Sociology Department of the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Campus Azcapotzalco, an expert witness proposed by the representatives, who testified on the following aspects: i) “the specific context of militarization in Guerrero [state] ;” ii) “the reason for and the impact of the presence of the Armed Forces in the rural communities of Guerrero and on the peasant movement, highlighting [alleged] patterns of human rights violations committed against civilians by the military;” iii) “aspects of the [alleged] militarization in Guerrero which are specific to this [s]tate and [would be] fundamental to understand the reasons for the military to [allegedly] detain, torture and invent crimes against the [alleged] victims and [how] the events described occurred;” iv) “the present situation in Guerrero regarding the [alleged] militarization and the impact of the anti-drug war on rural communities,” and v) “the reparation measures that the Mexican State should adopt in this case;” 10) Ana C. Deutsch, an expert in Clinical Psychology with experience in evaluating victims of torture, an expert witness proposed by the representatives, who testified on the following aspects: i) “the results of a psychological evaluation carried out on Messrs. Montiel and Cabrera, specifying the continued effects of the violations which they [allegedly] suffered,” and ii) the results of the evaluations conducted on relatives of 13