Facilitate him with free legal representation or lega! aid under Rule 31 of the Rules of Court and Article 10 (2) of the Protocol; Declare the Application admissible and give effectthereto by invoking the admissibility conditions prescribed in Article 56 of the Charter, Article 6(2) of the Protoco! and Rule 40 of the Rules of Court; ill Declare that the Respondent State has violated the Appticant's rights guaranteed by Articles 1, 2, 3,4,5,6, and 7 (c) and (2) of the Charter; IV consequently, issue an order compelling the Respondent state to set free the Applicant; V lssue an order for reparations by virtue of Article 27 (1) of the protocol and Rule 34(5) of the Rules, and such other order or measure as the Court may deem appropriate. should this Honourable Court find merit in the Application and in the prayers sought; VI 15. Quash the conviction for armed robbery, the punishment inflicted and release the Applicant from prison." ln the Reply to the Respondent State's Response, the Applicant reiterated his prayers, and sought the following orders from the Court: "A declaration that the Application is admissible and that the Court has jurisdiction to hear the case on the merits as per Articles 3(2) of the protocol and Rules 26(2) and 40(6) of its Rules; A declaration that the Respondent State has violated the Applicant's right to a fair trial as protected by the Charter under Article 7 on at least two grounds: failure to provide the Applicant with legal assistance; convicting the Applicant on the sole basis of it-"-r_ k ( 5 a statement under s