150. Having found that the Respondent State violated Articles 5 and 7(1)(d) of the Charter, the Court also finds a violation of Article 1 of the Charter. VIII. REPARATIONS 151. The Applicant requests the Court to order that his liberty be restored. He also asks the Court to order that damages be paid to him by the Respondent State for the moral and material loss suffered by himself and that suffered by his friends and relatives. The Applicant finally requests for orders on measures of satisfaction, nonrepetition and costs. 152. The Respondent State prays the Court to dismiss all the reliefs and orders sought by the Applicant for lack of merit or not being supported with evidence. ••• 153. The Court notes that, as Article 27( 1) of the Protocol provides, "If the Court finds that there has been violation of a human or peoples' rights it shall make appropriate orders to remedy the violation, including the payment of fair compensation or reparation". 154. In this respect, Rule 63 of the Rules provides that "The Court shall rule on the request for the reparation by the same decision establishing the violation of a human and peoples' rights, or if the circumstances so require, by a separate decision". 155. In its case law on reparations, the Court has ruled on "other reparations" in a separate decision where the Parties have not adduced sufficient evidence or none for it to do so in the main judgment44 or where it was necessary to hear the Parties extensively.45 156. The Court notes that written and oral submissions made by the Parties offer sufficient evidence to adequately consider the claims for reparation made in this See Application No. 01112011. Ruling on Reparations of 13106114, Reverend Christopher R. Mlikila v. United Republic ofTanzania, § 124 and Application No. 011/2015. Judgment of 28/09117, Christopher Jonas v. United Republic ofTanzania, §. 97. 45 See Mohamed Abubakari v. Tanzania, op. cit., § 237. 44 37