Verbal to the Respondent State and in accordance with established practice,6 the Commission is compelled to make its analysis without the submissions from the Government of the Republic of Kenya. THE COMMISSION’S ANALYSIS ON ADMISSIBILITY 36. A Communication submitted in terms of Article 55 must satisfy the seven requirements in Article 56 in order to be declared admissible. 37. The Commission recalls that the conditions outlined in Article 56 are cumulative and should all be adequately fulfilled for a communication submitted in conformity with the terms of Article 55 to be admissible. Consequently, nonrespect of any one of these conditions is liable to render a communication inadmissible.7 The Commission now considers the submissions of the parties in light of these requirements in series. Article 56(1) 38. Article 56(1) of the Charter states that “Communication relating to Human and Peoples’ Rights… received by the Commission shall be considered if they indicate their authors even if the latter request anonymity…” The requirement here is that complainants or authors of complaints proffer their identity8 and contact details9 to enable the Commission to adequately process the communication through assurances of continued interest in the matter.10 In the present case, the Communication is brought by Kamilya Mohammedi Tuweni, Badriyah Badr Hassan Abdalla, Bardees Badr Hassan and Hayatti Hafidh Salem Hassan. The Complainants are legally represented by REDRESS. The Communication duly complies with Article 56 (1). Article 56 (2) 6 Communication 292/04 - Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa (on behalf of Esmaila Connateh and 13 others) v Angola (2008) para 34; Communication 155/96 (2001); Social and Economic Rights Action Center and Center for Economic and Social Rights v Nigeria; Communication 325/06 (2006) World Organisation Against Torture and anor v Democratic Republic of Congo para 30 7 Communication 304/2005 - FIDH & Others v Senegal (2006) ACHPR para 38 8 Communication 308/05 : Michael Majuru v Zimbabwe, 24 November 2008, para 71. 9 Communication 70/92_9: Ibrahima Dioumessi, Sekou Kande, Ousmane Kaba v Guinea, 7 October 1995, para 11. 10 Communication 277/2003-Spilg and Mack & DITSHWANELO (on behalf of Lehlohonolo Bernard Kobedi) v Botswana, 12 October 2013, para 97. 10