CASTELLS v. SPAIN JUDGMENT 22 2. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 10 (art. 10); 3. Holds that it is not necessary to consider the case also under Article 14, taken together with Article 10 (art. 14+10); 4. Holds that, as regards the non-pecuniary damage alleged, the present judgment constitutes sufficient just satisfaction for the purposes of Article 50 (art. 50); 5. Holds that the Kingdom of Spain is to pay to the applicant, within three months, 3,000,000 (three million) pesetas for costs and expenses; 6. Dismisses the remainder of the applicant's claims. Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 23 April 1992. Rolv RYSSDAL President Marc-André EISSEN Registrar In accordance with Article 51 para. 2 (art. 51-2) of the Convention and Rule 53 para. 2 of the Rules of Court, the following separate opinions are annexed to this judgment: (a) concurring opinion of Mr De Meyer; (b) concurring opinion of Mr Pekkanen; (c) concurring opinion of Mr Carillo Salcedo, ad hoc judge. R. R. M.-A. E.