They further submit that no evidence has been provided by the State to demonstrate that the protestors posed a threat to national security or the other interests enumerated as justifying limitations under the Charter and thus that there was a violation of Article 11. In any case, the Complainants argue, the manner of the removal of the protestors, the level of force employed against protestors, the deaths and injuries sustained and the subsequence detention and treatment were unnecessary and disproportionate limitations on the right to assemble. Alleged violation of Article 14 109. In relation to Article 14, which guarantees the right to property, the Complainants allege that the protestors were forcibly removed without an opportunity to take any of their belongings, were prohibited by the authorities to recover their property upon their release and have received no justification or compensation for this deprivation and that this severally and cumulatively amount to a violation of Article 14. Alleged violation of Article 16 110. Regarding the right to the best attainable standard of physical and mental health pursuant to Article 16, the Complainants argue that this can be violated though direct action by the State or others insufficiently regulated by the State which cause positive harm to health and by failures to supply adequate access to health care. The Complainants submit that the acts of the authorities during the removal and the subsequent denial of adequate medical care violated the right of the Victims to physical and emotional health. Specifically, the Complainants submit that the Fourth Victim was not provided with medical care when his eye was injured and the Seventh Victim’s lungs were affected by the beatings at the hands of the riot police, and as a result of on-going lack of medical care, he remains weak and suffers from fainting spells. Alleged violation of Article 18 111. Regarding Article 18 on the sanctity of the family, the Complainants submit that the Respondent State violated the duty to protect all families within its jurisdiction through the decision to break up the protest and the manner of its execution, including the method used of dispersing the protestors, which had 27