15. Mr. Thomas submits that the delay in implementing the Court's Orders and in submitting the relevant report on compliance thereof has aggravated and unduly prolonged the violation of his rights and in light of this, the Court should set him free to ensure there are no further infringements of his rights. 16. Mr. Thomas prays for: "1. A Declaration that the Respondent is in default of this Honourable Court's Orders by failing to file a Report within six months of delivery of Judgment. 2. A Declaration that the Respondent is in further default of Orders by failing to file a Response to the Applicant's Submissions on Reparations on time or at all. 3. A Declaration that the instant Application is, in any case, frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of the process of this Honourable Court. 4. An Order to set the Applicant free pending the Judgment on reparations." IV. JURISDICTION OF THE COURT 17. The instant Application for interpretation concerns the Judgment rendered by the Court on 20 November 2015. 18. In terms of Article 28 (4) of the Protocol"... the Court may interpret its own decision." 19. The Court consequently finds that it has jurisdiction to interpret the said Judgment. V. ADMISSIBILITY OF THE APPLICATION 20. Rule 66(1) and ( 2)of the Rules provide as follows: 6