Four, that the Application be dismissed. With regard to the issue of merits, we request the African Court to declare as follows: that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania did not violate the Applicant's rights to be represented and to a fair trial with regard to all the allegations he has brought before the Court. Number two, we pray that no reparation be granted to the Applicant with regard to this Application, and, finally that the Application be duly dismissed”. V. 15. REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION In its Response, indicating, according the Respondent OF FRESH EVIDENCE referred to its letter dated to it, that the collection of evidence would 13 December take some 2013 time, and therefore craved the indulgence and leave of the Court to adduce fresh evidence when the latter would be available. 16. Furthermore, at the Public Hearing of 22 May 2015, each of the parties, pursuant to Rule 50 of the Rules of Court, sought leave of the Court to submit fresh essentially comprising the evidence on the case before the national courts. documents To justify the delay, the two parties invoked mainly the difficulties faced in seeking for and finding the said documents given the fact that the meanwhile been relocated elsewhere. Registry of the District Court of Moshi had Each of the parties also indicated that it had no objection to the other's request in this regard. 17. Rule 50 of the Rules of Court provides that: “No party may file additional evidence after the closure of pleadings except by leave of Court”.