41. In consideration of the above-mentioned, the Applicant and the corresponding the evidence arguments presented by relating to the Attorney's fees do not allow for a complete justification of the amounts requested, therefore this claim is refused. C. Guarantees of non-repetition Request to adopt measures under domestic law 42. The Court reiterates the obligation of the Respondent State, as set out in Article 30 of the Protocol, to comply with the Court's Judgment. In its Judgment of 14 June 2013, the Court ordered that: “The Respondent is directed to take constitutional, legislative and all other necessary measures within a reasonable time to remedy the violations found by the Court and to inform the Court of the measures taken.” 43. The Court notes that in its Reply to the Applicant's submissions on reparations, the Respondent June 2013 was wrong independent maintains that the Court’s Judgment since the law in the Respondent candidature and to Local Government. for election to the Presidency, of 14 State prohibits to Parliament This was despite the Court's judicial finding that this prohibition is not in conformity with the Charter. This stance by the Respondent State is of concern to the Court and more so since the Respondent has never reported to the Court on the measures it is taking to adopt the constitutional, legislative and all other measures necessary to bring its law on candidature for elections to the Presidency, Parliament. and to Local Government in conformity with the Charter. In this regard 29 eek ZOo- NG \~> '~