Counsel spent spending thirty (30) hours forty (40) hours each each on the case on the case. with Regarding the assistants the Reply, the Applicant claims that the Counsel spent a total of fifteen (15) hours and the assistants a total of fifteen (15) hours. Applicant claims that the Counsel For the public hearing, the spent a total of fifteen (15) hours for preparation and attendance by one of them. For the reparation claim, the Applicant claims that each Counsel has spent twenty (20) hours for preparation of the brief. The Applicant claims that the hourly rate is US$ 250.00 (Two Hundred US$150.00 (One assistants. Hundred The and 45,000.00 and Fifty United States Dollars). for Counsel Hundred Applicant Eighty and Fifty claims (180) United that this States comes hours for the Counsel, (Forty Five Thousand United States Dollars). to for a total and the of One amounting Dollars). and to (US$ a total of One Hundred and Thirty Five (135) hours for the Assistants amounting to US$ 20,250.00 (Twenty Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty United States Dollars). Counsel for the Applicant have stated that “though they believe in the Court, when the Respondent implemented Salaam they should not bear the cost of the litigation especially the could decision in Miscellaneous have of the avoided High Civil Cause No. Court further of Tanzania 5 of 1993”. Counsel for the Applicant stated that they would litigation had at Dar it es In the alternative, accept reimbursement of their costs in line with the scales set out in the Legal Aid Policy of the Court. 39. The Court notes that expenses and costs form part of the concept of ‘reparations’. Therefore, where the international responsibility of a State. is established in a declaratory judgment, the Court may order the State ee. ON |