that a State compensate a ‘adequately victim for the torture and trauma suffered’, compensate standards* and Inter-American pecuniary ensure the victims payment Court of Human damages and in line with of a compensatory the circumstances or detriment to the victims’ income, nexus and with the the facts monetary of the benefit.° The Rights has held that with regard to compensation is appropriate, pecuniary damages of the facts, international under which involve “the /oss of the expenses incurred as a result consequences case sub that have judice.”© In the a causal Factory at Chorz6w Case the Permanent Court of International Justice stated that reparation payment may of a sum take the form of compensation “involving corresponding to the value which a restitution in kind would bear.”” > Communication 288/04 Gabriel Shumba v Zimbabwe 2 May 2012 paragraph 194 (1). * Communication 334/06 Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights and Interights v Egypt Thirty First Activity Report: May 2011 — November 2011 dispositif paragraph 2. ° Consolidated Communications 54/91, 61/91, 96/93, 98/93, 164/97, 196/97 and 210/98 Malawi African Association and Others v Mauritania Thirteenth Activity Report: 1999 — 2000 dispositif paragraph 3. ® Inter American Guatemala. 91, Court of Human Rights (IACHR) Case of Bamaca Velasquez v Reparations and Costs. Judgment of 22 February, 2002. Series C No. paragraph 43, and Case of Garcia Cruz and Sanchez Silvestre. Merits ~ = Zz Reparations and Costs. Judgment of 26 November 2013. Series 273, paragraph eee 7 See Note 1 at 47. Www 23 \ y™“ ae a eS. .C #- S fo