v. Furthermore, the Applicant states that the Accounts Clerks who certified the accounts he submitted to the Court are available and may be called to testify before the Court. State to show proof of errors, It is also if any, in up to the Respondent the Applicant's claim for damages. vi. Regarding Applicant the Attorney's fees for the litigation before the Court, the submits that the expenses must be imputed on the Respondent State as the Court held it responsible for the violation of its obligations under the Charter, particularly as the Applicant's request for legal aid from the Court was not granted. vii. The Applicant contends that the Court's Judgment means that the Respondent should be liable for paying the damages, as the Court stated that the electoral laws of the Respondent State are a violation of the Charter in relation to the rights of the Applicant. Article 30 of the Protocol obliges State Parties thereto to implement the decisions of the Court. viii. The Applicant stated that the position of the Respondent which maintains that the law as it currently is in Tanzania prohibits independent candidates draw up for electoral a precise positions, calendar to highlights the need ensure that the for the Court to Respondent State complies with the Judgment of the Court. ix. For these reasons, the Applicant the Court to reject all the ee arguments presented by the Respondent and to grant his prayers as per >= his Application. prays iy U 19 Me hoe @ Bo (Bs 0