7.2 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and Article 11.2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Man. 47. Finally, Mr. Hissein Habre also refers to Articles 11 and 24 of the Rome Statute establishing the International Criminal Court, which under the principle of non retroactivity limiting the jurisdiction of this Court and criminal liability for events occurring after entry into force of the Statute. For its part the State of Senegal maintains that it has to comply with its international obligations it has made changes criticized by the applicant and added that the retroactive jurisdiction of its courts for acts of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crime does not establish a new offense with retroactive effect to the extent these facts are required for criminals under the rules of international law at the date of their commission. 48. However, despite the denials of Defendant's perfunctory, the Court noted that beyond the justification of the compliance of its legislation with its international commitments, the government of Senegal has seriously infringed the provisions of Article 7.2 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and Article 11.2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which prohibits the retroactive provision of a criminal. 49. The question of the Court now is whether the various mechanisms engaged by Senegal namely the establishment of structures to meet the mandate given by the African Union is a violation of Articles 7.2 and 11.2 African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as claimed Mr. Hissein Habré? 50. The Applicant itself binds the violation of his rights, not a concrete fact, but