.oc07$3 90. The Court notes that the violation it established caused moral prejudice to the Applicant. The Court therefore, in exercising its discretion, awards an amount of Tanzania Shillings Three Hundred Thousand (TZS 300,000) as fair compensation.24 B. Non-Pecuniary Reparations 91. Regarding the order for release prayed by the Applicant, the Court has stated that it can be ordered only in specific and compelling circumstances. 25 Examples of such circumstances include "if an Applicant sufflciently demonstrates or the Court by itself establishes from its findings that the Applicant's arrest or conviction is based entirely on arbitrary considerations and his continued imprisonment would occasion a miscarriage of justiss."eo 92.ln the matter of Armand Guehi v. United Republic of Tanzania, this Court observed that the determination of whether factors in a given case are special or compelling must be done with a goal of maintaining fairness and avoiding double jeopardy.2T 93.|t is the Court's view that the Applicant has not demonstrated specific or compelling circumstances to warrant an order for release. 94. Therefore, the Court rejects the Applicant's request to be released from prison 2a See Anaclet Paulo v Tanzania (Merits and Reparations) $ 107; Minani Evarist v Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), $ 85. 25 Alex Thomas v Tanzania (Merits) op. crt, $ '157; Diocles Wittiam v Tanzania (Merits), S 101; Minani Evaist v Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), S 82j Application No. 006/2016. Judgment ot 07112120'18 (Merits), Mgosi Mwita v United Republic of Tanzania, S 84; Kijiji lsiaga v Tanzania (Merits), S 96; Armand Guehi v Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), 5164. 26Minani Evaist v Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), g 82. 27 See Armand Guehi v Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), $ 164 22