doosor 54.Accordingly, the Court dismisses the objection relating to the non-compliance with the requirement of filing the Application within a reasonable time after exhaustion of local remedies. B. Conditions of admissibility not in contention between the Parties 55.The Court notes that there is no contention regarding the compliance with the conditions set out in Rule 40, Sub-rulesl , 2, 3, 4 and 7 of the Rules on, the identity of Applicant, the language used in the Application, compliance with the Constitutive Act of the African Union, the nature of the evidence adduced and the previous settlement of the case, respectively, and that nothing on the record indicates that these requirements have not been complied with. 56. The Court therefore finds that all the admissibility conditions have been met and that this Application is admissible. VII. MERITS 57.The Applicant claims the violations of his right to fair trial and sets out the following elements of this right: a. b. c. The evidence relied upon to convict him was defective; The failure to summon the defence witnesses; and The failure to provide the Applicant with free legal aid. A. Allegation that the evidence relied upon to convict him was defective 58. The Applicant alleges that the national courts solely relied upon defective voice and visual identification evidence to uphold his conviction. He avers that the evidence was not properly evaluated and that the quality of the light used by t4 ,,/ @-