Article 7 on the right to non-discrimination, Article 8 on the right to effective remedy, Article 23 on the right to work and to a fair remuneration, Article 25 on the right to adequate standard of living and Article 30 on the obligation of States to refrain from engaging in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of the rights and liberties set forth in the Declaration. They further alleged that the brutality and humiliation they suffered at the hands of the police also constitute a violation of the Declaration. 3. In its decision of 28 March, 2014, the Court held that the Application is inadmissible. The relevant portions of that decision are as follows: “3) iv. On the admissibility of the Application, unanimously...: Sustains the Respondent's Applicants’ failure to objection to the admissibility of the Application due to exhaust local remedies with respect to alleged violations relating to claims for compensation; v. Sustains the Respondent's objection to the admissibility of the Application due to failure to exhaust local remedies with respect to the alleged police brutality; 4) Declares this Application inadmissible.” ll. PROCEDURE 4. On 30 June 2014, the Court received an Application filed by Frank David Omary and Others against the Respondent. Me 2 1\ 2. ae = SJ alpes |