a) Twenty Thousand (20,000) euros as reparation for moral damage for being held in police custody beyond the maximum legal duration; b) Two Hundred Thousand (200,000) euros as reparation for moral damage for having been deprived of liberty; c) One Hundred Thousand (100,000) euros as reparation for moral damage resulting from the oppression and sense of injustice caused by the violation of her procedural rights and the adoption of illegal and exceptional procedures; d) One Hundred Thousand (100,000) euros as reparation for moral damage resulting from the violation of her right to defence, and for having been convicted based on an invalid examination, as well as for the court’s refusal to conduct a new examination and failure to comply with the requirements of a fair trial; e) Two Hundred Thousand (200,000) euros as reparation for moral prejudice resulting from the loss of custody of her two sons; f) Two Hundred Thousand (200,000) euros for moral prejudice resulting from the family and social scandal that continues to haunt her to this day; g) One Hundred Thousand (100,000) euros as reparation for moral prejudice resulting from the fact that she was forced to leave her country and reside in France to avoid the disastrous consequences of the violations she suffered. vi. Order the Respondent State to apply the provisions of Article 277 of its Code of Criminal Procedure, by reviewing decision of 19 January 2015 rendered by the Nabeul Court of Appeal, and to vacate the judgment of 9 December 2014 on grounds of invalid proceedings and, as a precautionary measure, to close the case as there is no evidence that the Applicant committed any crime; vii. Order the Respondent State to guarantee non-repetition of the violations found, by taking all legislative, judicial and administrative measures to: a) Help expedite and facilitate the establishment and operationalization of the Constitutional Court, in accordance with the requirements of the Respondent State’s law; b) Clarify that divorce is the right to terminate a conjugal relationship and that neither spouse may be prevented from terminating a 8