29. The Respondent State failed to provide any arguments or evidence, despite being notified of such requests. As a result, in line with its established jurisprudence, the Commission will proceed with its analysis based on the information presented by the Complainant and its examination, ultimately rendering a decision by default. 30. Analysis of the African Commission 31. In accordance with Article 56 of the African Charter, a Communication must meet die seven admissibility requirements outlined in the Article, before it can be considered by the Commission as admissible. The Commission emphasizes in its jurisprudence that these conditions listed in Article 56 are cumulative and must all be satisfactorily fulfilled, for a communication submitted in accordance with Article 55 to be considered admissible. 32. The Commission will deliberate on the Complaint, considering the aforementioned requirements and the available information. It is important to note that the Complainant did not explicitly address each requirement individually. Therefore, the Commission will evaluate whether the complaint satisfies the requirements by considering the various submissions. Article 56(1) 33. Article 56(1) of the African Charter provides that Communications must indicate their authors, even when the latter requests anonymity. As was held by the Commission in Spilg and Mack 6* DITSHWANELO (on behalf of Lehlolionolo Bernard Kobedi) vs. the Republic of Botswana case, this requirement enables the Commission to effectively process communications by ensuring a sustained interest in the subject matter under its jurisdiction.' In the present case, the Communication is brought by Abdulrashid Abshir Warsaw, (the Victim), on his behalf. The Complainant, Mr. Warsame, has indicated his name in the communication and did not request anonymity. Hence, the Commission notes that the Communication duly complies with Article 56(1) of the African Charter. Article 56(2) 34. Pursuant to Article 56(2) of the African Charter, a Communication must align with the Charter of the Organization of African Unity and the African Charter. Regarding the compatibility of the Communication with the Constitutive Act of the African Union, the Commission acknowledges that the Complainant has claimed violations of human rights guaranteed by the African Charter, which explicitly includes the protection of these rights as one of its objectives under Article cRETAn !Communication 277/2003, Spilg and Mack & DITSHWANELO (on behalf of Lehlohon Botswana (ACHPR) para 97. l=Bema AU-UA 4*RI€A\N€ Er us P