5 por the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights: Claudio Grossman, Delegate, and María Claudia Pulido, Principal Specialist for the representatives of the alleged victim: Fernando López, representative of CALDH Frank La Rue, lawyer, CALDH for the State of Guatemala: Cruz Mungía Sosa, Deputy Executive Director of the Presidential Human Rights Commission witnesses proposed by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and by the representatives of the alleged victim: Maritza Ninette Urrutia García Edmundo Urrutia Castellanos María Pilar García de Urrutia Daniel Robert Saxon, and Edmundo Urrutia García; expert witness proposed by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and by the representatives of the alleged victim: Carlos Joaquín Bethancourt Monzón. 21. On February 21, 2003, during the public hearing, the witness, Daniel Robert Saxon, presented five photographs related to the case.3 The representatives of the alleged victim presented a copy of an undated, unsigned document that contained photographs and information on different individuals related to the case4 and a videocassette entitled “Declaraciones y otras noticias sobre el caso Maritza Urrutia” [Statements and other information on the Maritza Urrutia case]5. 22. On May 16, 2003, the Secretariat, on the instructions of the President, granted the Commission, the representatives of the alleged victim, and the State until June 20, 2003, to present their the final written arguments. 23. On June 18, 2003, the Commission requested a one-month extension to present its final written arguments. The same day, the Secretariat, on the instructions of the President, granted an extension until July 16, 2003, to the 3 Cf. “Record of Reception of Documents” of February 21, 2003 (folios 214 to 219 of Tome II of the file on merits and possible reparations). 4 Cf. “Record of Reception of Documents” of February 21, 2003 (folios 220 to 241 of Tome II of the file on merits and possible reparations). 5 Cf. “Record of Reception of Documents” of February 21, 2003 (folios 242 to 243 of Tome II of the file on merits and possible reparations).

Select target paragraph3