B. Alleged violations 9. In his Application filed on 27 February 2017, the Applicant alleges that the Respondent State violated his rights guaranteed by the Charter and by the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen , particularly his rights as follows : "i. the right to equal protection of the law guaranteed by Articles 3(2) of the Charter and 12 of the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen; II. the right to respect for the dignity inherent in the human person guaranteed by Article 5 of the Charter, notably the trespass on his honour and his reputation; iii. the right to liberty and to his security enshrined in Article 6 of the Charter and Article 7 of the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen ; iv. the right to have his cause heard guaranteed by Article 7 of the Charter; v. the right to presumption of innocence until proven guilty by a competent court, guaranteed by Articles 7(1)b of the Charter and 9 of the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen; vi. the right to property guaranteed under Article 14 of the Charter; vii. the duty of the State to guarantee the independence of the courts guaranteed by Article 26 of the Charter". 10.ln his new allegations filed before this Court on 16 October 2018 after CRIET Judgment, the Applicant contends that, by that procedure, the Respondent State violated his rights as listed hereunder: -, the right to be informed of the charges preferred against him ; - the right to access the record of proceedings; - the right for his cause to be heard by competent national courts; ~e:;y;: b~rdwit I na reason, @ ~~