ii. Grant reparations pursuant to Article 27(1) of the Protocol; and iii. Grant any other order legal remedy it may deem fit and just to grant in the circumstances of his application. 13. In its Response, with regard to jurisdiction and admissibility of the Application, the Respondent State prays the Court to: i. Find that the Court is not vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate this Application as a criminal appellate court; ii. Find that the Application had not met the admissibility requirements that are prescribed in Article 56(5) and (6) of the Charter, Article 6(2) of the Protocol and Rule 40(5)3 and (6)4 of the Rules of Court; iii. Declare the Application inadmissible; and iv. Dismiss the Application. 14. With regard to the merits of the Application, the Respondent State prays the Court to: i. Find that the Respondent State did not violate the Applicant’s rights as guaranteed under Articles 2, 3 and 7 of the Charter; and ii. Find that the Respondent State did not violate any of the Applicant’s rights provided for under the Charter. V. JURISDICTION 15. The Court observes that Article 3 of the Protocol provides as follows: 1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall extend to all cases and disputes submitted to it concerning the interpretation and application of the Charter, this Protocol and any other relevant Human Rights instrument ratified by the States concerned. 3 4 Corresponding to Rule 50(2)(e) of the Rules of 25 September 2020. Corresponding to Rule 50(2)(f) of the Rules of 25 September 2020. 5