(c) The Court of Appeal of Tanzania did not fully evaluate the evidence on record as they were required to do. (d) The Court of Appeal misled itself as to the location of the crime. He states that at the committal proceedings, the crime was alleged to have occurred at Kivuyo at Meserani Village in Monduli District, whereas in the judgment of the Court of Appeal , the scene of the crime is stated to be Meserani Village in Monduli. This, the Applicant states instead that he was arrested at Mererani in Simanjiro District and Manyara Region. The Applicant states that this misdirection created the false impression that he was arrested near the scene , yet he was arrested more than one hundred (1 00) kilometres away. (e) The Applicant contends there were undue delays in the hearing of his application for review at the Court of Appeal and discrepancies in trial and appellate proceedings. II. Procedure before the Court 5. The Application was received at the Registry of the Court on 13 April 2016. 6. Pursuant to Rule 36 of the Rules of Court, by a notice dated 31 May 2016, the Registry served the Application on the Respondent. :1 _b ~ ~"~03