confessions in a judgment that has acquired the effect ofa final judgment and is later found to or fraud, violence, be false; when there has been prevarication, bribery, and facts subsequently proven to be false, such as a person having been declared missing and found to be alive.’ 39. The Court notes that having filed an Application for Review containing a request for Provisional Measures, the Applicant also attached supporting documents to both requests. In this regard, the Court further notes that the supporting documents adduced by the Applicant in relation to his Application for Review is an agreement for the design and construction of stadia in Sekondi-Takoradi & Tamale for the CAN 2008 tournament signed between the Respondent State and Shanghai Construction Group Company, marked exhibit “AAVW1”. The Applicant relies on this document to support his assertion that he has discovered new “evidence” in form of an agreement between the Respondent State and another Company in relation to the construction of the stadia for the CAN 2008. 40. The Court observes “AAW2 — AAW12”; therefore, that the rest of exhibits were adduced adduced, that is, in support of the request for Provisional Measures as they relate to on-going execution proceedings against the Applicant in the national courts. These exhibits will not be considered herein in the determination of the admissibility of the Application for Review as they have no connection with the same. 41. As regards Shanghai the agreement Construction between Group the Company, Respondent the Court State observes and the that this information had indeed not been brought to its attention at the time of the initial Judgment. between Nevertheless, the Shanghai it is inconceivable that the said contract Construction Group and the Respondent State which was in the public domain since 2005 was not within the Applicant's knowledge at the time of the delivery of the initial Judgment. In addition, the said agreement would also have been brought forth given the media ? Genie Lacayo v Nicaragua, (Application for judicial review of the judgment of merits, reparations and costs), IACHR Series C no 45, § 12. 11