00il10 99.The Court notes that the Applicant submits that the conditions and lifestyle of his wife Goudjo lda Afiavi and his children Ronald, Evaella and Ludmilla, have deteriorated since the seizure of their accounts. The Court also notes that according to the medical report made out on 4 December 2018 by the psychologist of the Groupement Hospitalier de Teritoire de Saint-Denis in France, the Applicant, his wife tda and his children Ronald and Ludmilla, who were received in emergency on 11 October and 28 November 2018, "suffer from a major psychological trauma that was complicated by insomnia, headaches and behavioural crises that require neuroscience investigation". 100. The Court also notes that the exile of the Applicant's family members is linked to the violations of the Applicant's rights before cRlET, such that the alleged psychological distress or sufferings are established. 101. ln this respect, the court, ruling on the basis of equity, grants the claim for reparation for the moral prejudice suffered by the Applicant's family members and awards them the lump sum of Fifteen million (15,000,000) CFA Francs for the wife and Ten million (10,000,000) CFA Francs for each chitd. 2) Non-pecuniary reparation 102. Inthe instantcase, theApplicantsubmitsthatsincethe initiation of the international drug trafficking case, he and his family members have been facing numerous difficulties resulting from the seizure of their bank accounts and from prohibition from carrying out transactions on the accounts. 103. Following the reopening of the proceedings on the prejudice resulting from the failure of the investment in the petroleum sector, the Applicant prays the Court to find that the Respondent State has refused to implement the Court's judgment of 29 March 2019. 27 -Y @-