2010, accepting the competence of the Court to receive cases from individuals and NGOs filed against the Respondent. 44. Concerning those allegations that implicate the Republic of Kenya, the Court observes that the Republic of Kenya has not made the declaration required under Article 34 (6) of the Protocol allowing individuals to directly file an application before this Court. In this regard, the Court notes that the Registry of the Court has, in accordance with Rule 35 (2) (b) and (4) (b) of its Rules, invited the Republic of Kenya to intervene in the case, if it so wishes, since the Applicants are its nationals, but the Republic of Kenya did not do so and in these circumstances, the Court lacks personal jurisdiction to entertain allegations against Kenya. 45. The Court observes that its lack of competence on some allegations of the Applicants directed to the Republic of Kenya does not prevent it from proceeding with the examination of this Application and address those allegations raised against the Respondent. Articles 5 (3) and 34 (6) of the Protocol empower the Court to examine allegations brought before it in so far as these allegations involve the Respondent, which has deposited the required declaration. 46. In view of the above, the Respondent's preliminary objection to the competence of the Court on the basis that the present Application contains allegations which implicate the Republic of Kenya is dismissed and the Court finds that it has personal jurisdiction to examine the allegations against the Respondent in the instant Application. c. Other Aspects of Jurisdiction 47. With regard to the other aspects of its jurisdiction, the Court notes: (i) that it has temporal jurisdiction since the alleged violations are continuous in nature, the Applicants having remained convicted on grounds which they believe are flawed by irregularities [see the Court's jurisprudence in the Zongo case ]6; 6 See African Court especially in the Matter of Zongo and Others v. Burkina Faso (Preliminary Objections) Judgment of 21 June 2013, paras 71 to 77. 14

Select target paragraph3