I. The allegation that the Tanzanian Government through all its official actions violated all accepted principles of human rights and international law; II. The allegation that the Respondent State violated Article 3 of the Charter; iii. The allegation that the Respondent State violated Article 6 of the Charter by re-arresting the Applicants on 11 March 2005, after their acquittal by the trial Magistrate, of charges of armed robbery and conspiracy to commit crimes, and by detaining them incommunicado in a police cell at the Central Police Station in Dar es Salaam for four days without food; iv. The allegation that the conviction and sentencing of the Applicants to 30 years imprisonment by the High Court is unconstitutional and contrary to Article 7 (2) of the Charter. 29. The Respondent also avers that the allegation of the Applicants that the identification parade was flawed with procedural irregularities is a matter requiring the Court to sit as a "supreme appellate court". The Respondent argues that the Applicants are asking the Court to adjudicate on an issue of evidence, which was already addressed and concluded by the Court of Appeal of Tanzania. 30. Finally, the Respondent challenges the material jurisdiction of the Court contending that the Applicants' allegation that it "violated all acceptable principles of human rights" is vague and does not disclose any particular article alleged to have been violated. ii) Applicants' submissions 31. On their part, the Applicants argue that the Court has material jurisdiction to deal with this Application. In this regard, the Applicants contend that there have been violations of their fundamental human rights as provided in the 10 ~~ h~b