(12,650,000 TZS) per year through carpentry and farming. As a direct result of the Respondent’s actions, he has lost this income for the past seventeen (17) years. Consequently, he requests an award of Two Hundred and Fifteen Million, Fifty Thousand Shillings (215,050,000 TZS) for lost income during incarceration. He also avers that his family spent Eleven Thousand Shillings (11,000 TZS) visiting him in prison and prays for a reimbursement of the travel expenses. * 156. The Respondent State prays that the prayer for reparations be dismissed. *** 157. The Court recalls that for a claim for material prejudice to be granted, an applicant must show a causal link between the established violation and the loss suffered, and further prove the loss suffered.65 Furthermore, the Applicant must provide justification for the amounts claimed.66 The Applicant must also provide acceptable evidence to prove expenses allegedly incurred, such as receipts for the payments.67 158. In the instant case, the Court observes that the Applicant does not provide any documentary evidence to support his claim and fails to establish a nexus between the alleged violations and the harm suffered. The Court, therefore, dismisses this prayer. 65 See Guehi v. Tanzania, supra, § 181; Zongo and Others v. Burkina Faso (reparations), § 62; Henerico v. Tanzania, supra, § 180. 66 Zongo and Others v. Burkina Faso (reparations), supra, § 81; and Mtikila v. Tanzania (reparations), supra, § 40. 67 Christopher Jonas v. United Republic of Tanzania (reparations) (25 September 2020) 4 AfCLR 545, § 20; Guehi v. Tanzania, supra, § 18. 43