(C) AN ORDER obliging the Respondent to pay the applicant the sum of $19,030, being this the additional cost of feeding and rental of the trucks for an additional period of 33 days. OR (D) AN ORDER obliging the Respondent to pay the sum of D2,558,400.00 (two million, five hundred and fifty-eight thousand and four hundred dalasis), being this the cost of acquisition of the goods after deduction of the sum of D468,000 raised by the sale of the perished fish and a sum of $36,330 (thirty-six thousand three hundred and thirty dollars), being this the cost of feeding and hiring the trucks for 63 days. (E) AN ORDER obliging the Respondent to pay a sum of ₦5,000,000 (five million Naira) only, the legal fees paid by the applicant for the trial of this case. (F) AN ORDER granting the applicant a sum of $100,000,000 (one hundred million US dollars) as general and exemplary compensations for psychological trauma, shock and loss of health due to the action of the defendant. 63. Therefore, the Applicant sought alternative reliefs for compensation, which the Court analyzed and concluded that the Applicant, on the one hand, did not demonstrate the existence of a causal link between the material damage claimed and the event committed by the Respondent (closure of the land border) and, on the other hand, that it offered no evidence to support the other non-pecuniary or moral damage he claimed, and consequently rejected the Applicant’s claims. (See pages 31 to 36 of the Judgment) 64. This means that in relation to the Reparations sought by the Applicant, the Court has ruled on all the questions put to it. 15

Select target paragraph3