229. That the failure to pay the allowances created in the Applicants a lack of support for their health, which also created a huge psychological distress. 230. They conclude that the conditions are met to order the Defendant to pay damages in FCFA 5,000,000 for the first three Applicants and for the Applicant Gislain AGBOZO, and 2,000,000 for the remaining Applicants, without specifying the grounds for the settlement of such amounts.  231. Indeed, as this court pointed out in the cited case KOMLAN RAYMOND KOUDO v. ECOWAS PARLIAMENT: “The terms of a contract is sacrosanct and are unequivocally enforceable to the extent that all parties are in conformity with their obligations therein. A party in breach will be obliged to remedy the wrong as appropriate.” 232. However, the Court considers that the Applicants’ argument is generic in that it does not specify the material or moral damages actually suffered by them, nor the causal link between such damages and the delay in payment of the aforementioned benefits owed to them by the Defendant. 233. Therefore, the Court concludes that the assumptions of the Defendant’s civil liability have not been established by the Applicants, and therefore, their claim is unfounded and should be dismissed. Default interest 234. The Applicants sought that the Defendant be ordered to pay default interest for the delay in payment of their rights, in the amounts they have settled as follows: 10,000,000 FCFA for the first 3 Applicants; FCFA 7,000,000 for Applicant Gislain AGBOZO and FCFA 5,000,000 for each of the remaining Applicants. 44