77. The Respondent State has not responded to this allegation 78. Article 2 of the Charter provides that 00CI502 "Every individual shall be entitled to the enjoyment of the rights and freedom recognized and guaranteed in present Charter without distinclion of any kind such as race, ethnicgroup, colour, sex, language, religion, political or any other opinion, national and social original fortunate, birth or any status" 79. . The Court notes that the right to non-discrimination as enshrined under Article 2 of the Charter proscribes any differential treatment to individuals found in the same situation on the basis of unjustifled grounds. ln the instant Application, the Applicant makes a general allegation that he was discriminated against by the Respondent State. He neither explains the circumstances of his differential treatment nor provides evidence to substantiate his allegation. ln this regard, the Court recalls its established jurisprudence that "general statements to the effect that a right has been violated are not enough. More substantiation is required.'15 80. The Court therefore dismisses this allegation and holds that the Respondent State has not violated Article 2 of the Charter. VIII. 81. REPARATIONS The Applicant prays that the court should resolve the complaint and restore justice where it was overlooked, quash both conviction and sentence imposed upon him and order his release. ln addition, the Applicant prays that the court order that the Respondent state pay compensation of ranzania shillings Thirty Six Million (TZS 36,000,000) and grant any other order it may deem fit. 82. ls The Respondent state avers that the Applicant's prayers should be dismissed but it did not file submissions in response to the Applicant's claim on reparations. Alex Thomas v Tanzania (merits) (201S) 1 AfCLR 465 S 140 21