IV. PRAYERS OF THE PARTIES 14. The First Applicant prays the Court to find that: i. It is vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate on his Application; ii. The Application meets the admissibility requirements stipulated under Rule 40(5) of the Rules and is thus admissible; iii. The Respondent State violated his right to have his cause heard as stipulated under Article 7(1) of the Charter; iv. The Respondent State violated his rights stipulated under Article 7(2) of the Charter; v. The Respondent State violated his right under Article 13(6)(c) of the Tanzanian Constitution of 1977; and vi. His conviction was based on the weakest evidence which was not admissible, credible, plausible, convincing [enough] as not to leave any room for reasonable doubt. 15. The First Applicant also prays the Court to order the Respondent State to bear the costs. 16. On the other hand, the Second Applicant prays that the Court to find that i. The Respondent State violated his rights under Article 7 (1) of the Charter by failing to hear his application for review at the Court of Appeal; ii. The Respondent State violated his right to free legal assistance during the domestic proceedings that led to his conviction and sentence, contrary to Articles 2 and 7(1)(d) of the Charter; and iii. Grant him reparations pursuant to Article 27 of the Protocol. 17. Furthermore, both the First and the Second Applicants pray the Court “to restore justice where it is overlooked and quash both the conviction and sentence and set him at liberty”. 18. With Respect to the First Applicant, the Respondent State prays the Court to find that: 5