Applicants themselves were surprised at the speed with which he disposed of the matter. 135, The Court therefore rules that the local procedure in respect this case has not been unduly prolonged by the Respondent. 136. On the allegation of police brutality, the Respondent submits that “there is no evidence to show whether these alleged victims or applicants have pursued any available local remedy against the Government regarding allegations of police brutality which they have complained about. Their letter to court dated 16" July, 2012...does not point towards this direction”. 137. The Applicants did not demonstrate any measures they took, or attempted to take to exhaust local remedies. In their Reply to the Respondent's Response, they cite their submission of 16 July 2012 to justify their exhaustion of local remedies. The said submission simply described the incidents that took place on that day, and nothing is said about any process initiated in Court. The Court therefore holds that the Applicants have not exhausted local remedies with respect to the allegations of police brutality. 138. well On both counts therefore, that is, the claim for compensation as as allegation of police brutality, the Court-holds Applicants have not exhausted local ae that the