file their appeal to the Court of Appeal, and this was scheduled for mention on 19 March, 2013. Ae On 27 November, 2013, the Court wrote to the parties requesting them to provide information on the status of the case at domestic level. December The Applicant informed the Court by letter of 12 that it has provided to the Court all relevant information relating to the Application. The Respondent on its part informed the Court by letter of 30 December, 2013, that it was still tracing the information requested. 118. The Applicants maintain that “there are no cases pending at the High Court of the Tanzania relating to miscellaneous Civil Case No. 95.2003”. They claim that the application filed by members of List 3A have been struck out twice, the last time being on 11 October, 2012. 119. The Applicants argue further that when Justice Twaib, members of List 3A “came they appeared before before the Judge with a fresh payroll with a bigger sum asking him to substitute it for the one that had passed through the bench of appeal court judges. The Judge told them that he was not there to rule on a new thing other than what was in the pact received from the Supreme Honourable Judge dismissed Court...In his ruling, the this fresh Application...". They argue that “the ruling of Justice Fauz shows clearly that he only dismissed the new payroll list delivered to him by Applicants of List 3A to be substituted with the one in the pact presented to him by the Court Appeal bench a to be determine forthwith. Since he did not dismiss